NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Troskie v NSW Department of Education & Communities [2014] NSWCATAD 155 Hearing dates: 16 April 2014 Decision date: 25 September 2014 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Principal Member Decision: Decision of the respondent is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - administrative review - access to government information - request for access to information in an internal investigation report of a complaint - refusal to grant access to information that is personal information about a person other than the access applicant and which was supplied in confidence - whether there was an overriding public interest against the disclosure of this information Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Administrative and Civil Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Alexander v University of Sydney [2008] NSWADT 214 AMH v Western New South Wales Local Health District [2013] NSWADT 280 Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR180 Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal v Sydney Services Pty Limited [2008] NSWADTAP 79 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Camilleri (GD) [2012] NSWADTAP 19 McInnes v NSW Department of Education and Communities [2013] NSWADT 219 McKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury [2006] HCA 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sheridan Helen Troskie (Applicant) NSW Department of Education & Communities (Respondent) Representation: Troskie (Applicant in person) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 133339
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate