NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v MJB [2014] NSWCCA 195 Hearing dates: 17 September 2014 Decision date: 29 September 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Fullerton J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Quash the sentence imposed by Flannery DCJ on 28 March 2014 and in lieu thereof: (a) Impose a sentence of nine years with a non-parole period of six years and nine months; and (b) Note that the earliest time the respondent is eligible to be released is 17 October 2017. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - sentence manifestly inadequate - aggregate sentence imposed - implicit concurrence between indicative sentences for multiple sex offences against four children - abuse of trust, power and familial ties - residual sentence not exercised Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M, 61O, 91G, 91H Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 28, 29, 30A, 44, 53, 53A Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Carlton v R [2014] NSWCCA 14 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293; Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Kaminic v R [2014] NSWCCA 116 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Gorman [2002] NSWCCA 516; 137 A Crim R 326 R v Harris [2007] NSWCCA 130; 171 A Crim R 267 R v Loveridge [2014] NSWCCA 120 R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 R v Slack [2004] NSWCCA 128 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 219 Reeves v The Queen [2013] HCA 57 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) MJB (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Girdham SC (Applicant) P Coady (Respondent) Solicitors: S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Applicant) SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/15895 2011/76877 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Before: Flannery DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate