NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Bennett [2014] NSWCCA 197 Hearing dates: 23 April 2014 Decision date: 29 September 2014 Before: Simpson J at [1] Hall J at [21] Harrison J at [106] Decision: (1) Crown appeal allowed; (2) Sentence imposed in the District Court quashed; (3) In lieu thereof the respondent be sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years and 3 months commencing on 27 April 2013 and expiring on 26 July 2016, with a balance of term of 2 years and 6 months expiring on 26 January 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - respondent convicted of one count of break and enter a dwelling house and commit a serious indictable offence in circumstances of aggravation - the sentencing judge erred in failing to find that the injury, emotional harm, loss or damage caused by the offence was substantial leading to the imposition of a sentence that was manifestly inadequate - the sentencing judge erred in failing to find as an aggravating factor that the offence was committed in the home of the victim - the sentencing judge erred in his classification of the objective seriousness of the offence - the sentencing judge erred in his approach to a finding of special circumstances pursuant to s 44 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act - the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge was manifestly inadequate - Crown appeal allowed - sentence quashed and respondent re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Clarke v R [2009] NSWCCA 49 Gibb v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 118 CLR 628 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Kelly v R (2004) 218 CLR 216 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 Portolesi v R [2012] NSWCCA 157 R v Fahda [2013] NSWCCA 86 R v O'Donoghue (2005) 151 A Crim R 597; [2005] NSWCCA 62 R v Palijan [2012] NSWCCA 142 R v Price [2005] NSWCCA 285 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412 Regina v Solomon [2005] NSWCCA 158; (2005) 153 A Crim R 32 Republic of Turkey v Mackie Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 309 Texts Cited: DC Pearce & RS Geddes in Statutory Interpretation in Australia, 7th ed, 2011 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Rodney James Bennett (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Lydiard (Crown) M Johnston (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/358716 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-10-11 00:00:00 Before: Hoy DCJ File Number(s): 2012/358716
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate