NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Carr v R [2014] NSWCCA 202 Hearing dates: 17/09/2014 Decision date: 01 October 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Adamson J at [50] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - knowingly making an improvised explosive device with intent to injure - whether sentence was manifestly excessive - whether sentencing judge erred in finding that the applicant's motive increased the objective seriousness of the offending Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 55(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A(2)(j) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Cases Cited: Dang v R [2013] NSWCCA 246 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321; 115 A Crim R 558 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520; 204 A Crim R 434 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120; 212 A Crim R 254 Quealey v R [2010] NSWCCA 116 R v Bonnet [2013] NSWCCA 234 R v Mitchell; R v Gallagher [2007] NSWCCA 296; 177 A Crim R 94 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glenn Ronald Carr (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: R Burgess (Applicant) J Girdham SC (Crown) Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2012/394790 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-11-20 00:00:00 Before: Hanley DCJ File Number(s): 2012/394790
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate