NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Reitberger [2014] NSWDC 154 Hearing dates: 28 April 2014 - 30 April 2014 Decision date: 01 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Williams ADCJ Decision: Application to exclude evidence of two telephone calls is dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - judgment - Application to exclude evidence from the jury - Pretext conversations - Admissibility of - Sexual allegations Legislation Cited: Evidence Act Surveillance Devices Act 2007 Listening Devices Act 1984 Cases Cited: DJS v R; NS v R (2012) NSWCCA 9 Duke v R (1989) CLR 508 at 513 Employment Advocate v Williamson 2001 FCA 1164 Juric v R (2002) 199 A Crim R 408 Pavitt v R [2007] NSWCCA 88 R v Broyles [1991] 3 SCR 595 R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335 R v LDV (No 2) [2013] NSWDC 215 R v Swaffield; Pavic v R 192 CLR 159 R v XY (2013) NSWCCA 121 WK v R [2011] VSCA 345 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Claude Reitberger Representation: Counsel: Ms D D'Aleo - The Crown Mr P Strickland SC - The accused Mr Hunt - The Accused Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2012/371680 Publication restriction: There is to be no publication of the name of the complainant or of any material which may tend to identify the complainant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate