NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Davis v Gosford City Council [2014] NSWCA 343 Hearing dates: 19 May 2014 Decision date: 03 October 2014 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Ward JA at [2]; Preston CJ of LEC at [3] Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The appellants are to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal to this Court. Catchwords: APPEAL - decision of judge of Land and Environment Court (LEC) dismissing appeal against decision of commissioners of LEC on questions of law - leave to appeal limited to two matters - whether judge and commissioners erred in their assessment of the degree of effect on threatened species required for refusal of development application - whether judge and commissioners failed to consider any concurrence of Director-General - relevant matters to consider in determining development application and grounds of refusal are not limited to an effect on threatened species that is likely to be a significant effect - no actual or assumed concurrence of Director-General to be considered - development not on critical habitat and not likely to significantly affect threatened species - consent to be refused not granted - no concurrence of Director-General required or able to be granted in these circumstances - commissioners and judge did not err on questions of law - appeal dismissed with costs Legislation Cited: Endangered Fauna (Interim Protection) Act 1991 s 4A Environmental and Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4(1), 5A, 76, 76A, 76B, 77, 77A(1), 78, 78A, 79B(3), 79C, 80, 80A, 90, 97(3), 111, 112, 115N, Pt 2, Div 5 Pt 5 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cll 2(1), 4(1), 50, 51, 59, 62, 64, 91(2), 92; cll 1(1), 2(1), 2(4) of Pt 1, Sch 1, cl 7 of Sch 2, Sch 3 Fisheries Management Act 1994 s 220ZZA Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 39, 56A(1), 57(4)(c) Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 s 6(2) Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, ss 4, 94A, Div 2 of Pt 6 Cases Cited: BT Goldsmith Planning Services Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2005] NSWLEC 210 Carstens v Pittwater Council [1999] NSWLEC 249; (1999) 111 LGERA 1 Corowa v Geographe Point Pty Ltd [2007] NSWLEC 121; (2007) 154 LGERA 117 Davis v Gosford City Council [2013] NSWLEC 49 Davis v Gosford City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1329 Davis v Gosford City Council [2012] NSWLEC 62 Michel Projects Pty Ltd v Randwick Municipal Council (1982) 46 LGRA 410 Minister for Planning v Walker [2008] NSWCA 224; (2008) 161 LGERA 423 Nambucca Valley Conservation Association v Nambucca Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 38 Newcastle and Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 48 Plumb v Penrith City Council [2002] NSWLEC 223 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 133; (2006) 67 NSWLR 256; (2006) 146 LGERA 10 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL [1999] NSWCA 8; (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Raymond John Davis and Mrs Susanne Margaret Davis (Appellants) Gosford City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr M R Hall (Barrister) with Mr T J Flaherty (Appellants) Ms S A Duggan SC with Mr M C Fraser (Respondent) Michael Flaherty (Solicitor) (Appellants) P J Donnellan & Co (Respondent) File Number(s): 140784 of 2013 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9106 Citation: [2013] NSWLEC 49 Date of Decision: 2013-04-16 00:00:00 Before: Pepper J File Number(s): 11243 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate