NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Khanchitanon v R [2014] NSWCCA 204 Hearing dates: 19 September 2014 Decision date: 03 October 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Fullerton J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: Refuse leave to appeal Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - sexual intercourse without consent - applicant was victim's employer - fact that victim continued to report to work did not ameliorate the applicant's abuse of authority - pedantry particularly inappropriate when remarks on sentence delivered orally and ex tempore - actual or potential deportation irrelevant to the sentencing exercise but error was in applicant's favour - leave refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61I, 61L Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A Cases Cited: Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Kaminic v R [2014] NSWCCA 116 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peeradej Khanchitanon (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Crawford-Fish (Applicant) N Adams (Crown) Solicitors: John B Hajje & Associates (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) File Number(s): 2012/105657 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-05-09 00:00:00 Before: Syme DCJ File Number(s): 2012/105657
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate