NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: El-Helou v R [2014] NSWCCA 209 Hearing dates: 22 August 2014 Decision date: 07 October 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Hidden J at [54]; Adams J at [55] Decision: (1) Allow the appellant's appeal against sentence. (2) Set aside order 4 made by this Court on 21 May 2010 and in lieu thereof: (a)set aside the orders of the District Court made on 10 July 2009; and (b)sentence the appellant Mr Gary El-Helou to a term of 10 years imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 6 years and 8 months commencing on 11 July 2008 and expiring on 10 March 2015, and a balance of term of 3 years and 4 months commencing on the expiration of the non-parole period and expiring on 10 July 2018. (c)Accordingly the appellant will become eligible for release on parole on 11 March 2015. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - parity - appellant pleaded guilty to knowingly taking part in one act of supply of prohibited drug - co-offender subsequently sentenced for an offence involving that and another act of supply and an offence of importing the drugs - whether appellant has justifiable sense of grievance in light of sentence imposed on co-offender in respect of the common offence - relevance of concurrence of co-offender's sentence with the sentence for his importation offence - sentences do not reflect marked differences between the offenders' respective offences and circumstances - appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 79(1)(b) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Code (Cth), ss 307.11(1), 400.4(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2) Cases Cited: Ayik v R [2013] NSWCCA 119 Balloey v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 165 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Jones v The Queen (1993) 67 ALJR 376 Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46; 154 CLR 606 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Ngati v R [2013] NSWCCA 203 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; 189 CLR 295 R v El Helou [2010] NSWCCA 111 R v Freeman [2005] NSWCCA 460 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Rees v R [2012] NSWCCA 47 Tran v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 266 Tu v R [2011] NSWCCA 31; 205 A Crim R 566 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Mathew El-Helou (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Dhanji SC (Appellant) G A Farmer SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Lenz Legal (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/4997 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2009-07-10 00:00:00 Before: Solomon DCJ File Number(s): 2009/4997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate