NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hasapis v R [2014] NSWCCA 216 Hearing dates: 8/09/2014 Decision date: 15 October 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Hamill J at [25] Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - robbery in company - whether verdict is unreasonable having regard to the nature and quality of the evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 97(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 12 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Cases Cited: Kurdi v R [2011] NSWCCA 179 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487; 76 A Crim R 213 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606; 135 A Crim R 361 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12; 30 A Crim R 315 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400; 209 A Crim R 433 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Hasapis (Appellant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Munro (Appellant) N Williams (Crown) Solicitors: O'Brien Solicitors (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2011/221061 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-11-02 00:00:00 Before: Craigie DCJ File Number(s): 2011/221061
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate