NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: QP v RP [2014] NSWCATAP 59 Hearing dates: 28 August 2014 Decision date: 09 October 2014 Before: N Hennessy, LCM Deputy President S Leal, Senior Member L Stewart, General Member Decision: The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) - appeal - procedure - Guardianship Division hearing - financial management order - financial manager - procedural fairness - reasonable opportunity to be heard - whether to grant leave to appeal - Civil and Administrative Act 2013, s80(2) - consideration of views of persons with disabilities - whether appealable decision - application for admission of further or fresh evidence. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Act 2013 (NSW) Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW) Cases Cited: BEX (2012) NSWGT 11 Building Professionals Board v Hans (2008) NSWADTAP 13 CDJ v VAKJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Gianoutsos v Glykis(2006) NSWCCA 137 Holt v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227 K v K (2000) NSWSC 1052 Category: Principal judgment Parties: QP (Appellant) RP (First Respondent) ST (Second Respondent) TT (Third Respondent) Representation: QP (Appellant in person) RP (Respondent in person) ST (Respondent in person) TT (Respondent in person) File Number(s): AP 14/46429 (AP 14/0251) Publication restriction: The publication or broadcast of the name of any person to whom these proceedings relate, without the consent of the Tribunal, is an offence under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, s 65(2). Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 150004 Date of Decision: 2014-05-27 00:00:00 Before: R Gurr S Stone J Koussa File Number(s): C/54901
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate