NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fordham v Davies [2014] NSWCATAP 60 Hearing dates: 19 August 2014 Decision date: 09 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Dr J Renwick SC, Senior Member S Thode, Senior Member Decision: The appeal is allowed in part. The claim for painting for $1652 is remitted back to Member B Howe for reconsideration without further evidence, pursuant to s 81(1)(e) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act. The decision under review is otherwise confirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) - question of law - adequacy of reasons - consideration of all issues - leave to appeal - new evidence - return of rental bond Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: Amaca Pty Ltd v Tullipan [2014] NSWCA 269 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Castel Electronics Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 83 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Fordham and Narelle Fordham (Appellants) Carly Davies and Lloyd Davies (Respondents) File Number(s): AP 14/46332 (AP 14/0055) Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 150003 Date of Decision: 2014-04-03 00:00:00 Before: B Howe File Number(s): RT 14/01151
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate