NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sundollar Pty Ltd v Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales [2014] NSWSC 1389 Hearing dates: 23 October 2013 Decision date: 10 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hidden J Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: CTTT - application for prerogative relief in respect of decision in a dispute about construction of a swimming pool - whether denial of procedural fairness - whether plaintiff refrained from leading evidence because of an assurance by a Tribunal member - effect of the member allowing representation of the opposing party without considering statutory requirements Legislation Cited: Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Regulation 2009 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: GPI Leisure Corp Ltd v Herdsman Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) (1990) 20 NSWLR 15 Minister for Immigration v Li [2013] HCA 18, 249 CLR 332 Phillips v Phillips [1966] 1 NSWR 49 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6, 214 CLR 1 Warrell v Walton [2013] FCA 291 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sundollar Pty Ltd t/as Sundollar Pools (plaintiff) Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales (1st defendant) Richard Bradshaw (2nd defendant) Representation: Counsel: MK Minehan (plaintiff) PM Knowles (2nd defendant) Solicitors: Peter Muller, QBM Lawyers (plaintiff) Norman Lucas, Maddocks (2nd defendant) File Number(s): 2013/56026
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate