NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Arambasic v Veza (No 5) [2014] NSWSC 1399 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 15 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Sackville AJ Decision: 1. Judgment for the second cross-claimant (Ms Veza) against the second cross-defendant (Dr White) in the sum of $85,600. 2. Judgment for the first plaintiff (Mr Arambasic) against the first and second defendants in the sum $9,200. 3. Grant leave to Mr Arambasic for the issue of a writ for the possession of the land comprised in folio identifier Lot 7, Sec 21, DP 758612, being the land situated at and known as 10 Potch Street, Lightning Ridge NSW 2834 (the Property), such writ not to be issued before 10 December 2014. 4. The second plaintiff (Dr White) pay the costs of the first and second defendants of her claim against them. 5. Dr White pay Ms Veza's costs of Ms Veza's cross-claim against Dr White for breach of contract. 6. The first and second defendants pay Mr Arambasic's costs of his claims for possession of the Property and for mesne profits. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - judgment and orders - calculation of damages including interest - award of costs - orders consequential on judgment for possession Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 98, 100 Cases Cited: Arambasic v Veza (No 4) [2014] NSWSC 1109 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Steve Slobodan Arambasic (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant)Jasmin White (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant)Kaye Monique Veza (First Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant)Gary James Griffiths (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiffs) H Jewell (Defendants) Solicitors: Stuart Percy & Associates File Number(s): 2013/312662 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate