NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v SH [2014] NSWCCA 218 Hearing dates: 8 September 2014 Decision date: 15 October 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Fullerton J at [40]; Hamill J at [41] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal under s 107 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) against directed acquittal - respondent found in possession of cardboard containing unascertained quantity of prohibited drug (lysergide) - charged with supply of not less than large commercial quantity of prohibited drug - weight of cardboard containing lysergide exceeded that required for large commercial quantity - whether evidence capable of establishing elements of offence when weight of lysergide not established - whether cardboard an "admixture" within s 4 of Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) - "question of law alone" - question posed by ground of appeal does not arise - appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal under s 107 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) against directed acquittal - application by Crown during respondent's address for leave to amend ground of appeal - application refused - relevant considerations identified Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 107 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 25, 29, 43, Sch 1 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 Australian Gas Light Co v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd [1996] HCA 36; 186 CLR 389 Davern v Messel [1984] HCA 34; 155 CLR 21 Fletcher International Exports Pty Ltd v Lott [2010] NSWCA 63 Green v The United States 355 US 184 (1957) HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd v Kostas [2009] NSWCA 292 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; 239 CLR 531 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 32; 241 CLR 390 Landsman v Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] NSWCA 369 OV v Members of the Board of the Wesley Mission Council [2010] NSWCA 155; 79 NSWLR 606 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Carroll [2010] NSWCCA 55; 77 NSWLR 45 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; 77 NSWLR 7 R v PL [2009] NSWCCA 256; 199 A Crim R 199 R v R2 (1990)19 NSWLR 513 Richards v Cornford (No 3) [2010] NSWCA 134 Thompson v Mastertouch TV Service Pty Ltd (No 3) (1978) 38 FLR 397 Williams v The Queen [1986] HCA 88; 161 CLR 278 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) SH (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Williams (Appellant) G Bashir (Respondent) Solicitors: S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Legal Aid NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/43895 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2014-06-02 00:00:00 Before: Jeffreys DCJ File Number(s): 2013/43895
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate