NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Baquiran v R [2014] NSWCCA 221 Hearing dates: 11 August 2014 Decision date: 17 October 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Adamson J at [66]; Bellew J at [67] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) Quash the sentences imposed by the District Court on the applicant on 5 April 2013 and substitute the following sentences. (4) On count 1 of the Indictment, sentence the applicant to 10 years imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 6 years and 8 months commencing on 28 January 2010 and expiring on 27 September 2016, and an additional term of 3 years and 4 months expiring on 27 January 2020. This sentence takes into account the matters on the applicable Form 1. (5) On count 2 of the Indictment, sentence the applicant to a term of 5 years and 6 months imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 3 years and 8 months commencing on 28 January 2013 and expiring on 27 September 2016, and an additional term of 1 year and 10 months expiring on 27 July 2018. (6) The total sentence to which the applicant is sentenced is 10 years imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 6 years and 8 months commencing on 28 January 2010 and expiring on 27 September 2016 and an additional term of 3 years and 4 months expiring on 27 January 2020. (7) Accordingly, the applicant will be eligible for release on parole on 28 September 2016. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - applicant pleaded guilty to two counts of supply of methylamphetamine - parity - whether justifiable sense of grievance in light of sentences imposed on co-offenders - whether sentencing judge bound by factual findings in remarks on sentence for co-offenders - whether sentencing judge erred in finding that the applicant was the principal of drug supply syndicate - what constitute proper bases for finding of special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Ith v R [2013] NSWCCA 280 Langbein v R [2008] NSWCCA 38; 181 A Crim R 378 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Chandler [2012] NSWCCA 135 R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Tisalandis [1982] 2 NSWLR 430 R v Tuuta [2014] NSWCCA 40 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jerry Uda Baquiran (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Carroll (Applicant) V Lydiard (Respondent) Solicitors: S E O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/25515 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-04-05 00:00:00 Before: Knox DCJ File Number(s): 2010/25515
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate