NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Guo Hui Cai v Xiao Yan Guo (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1416 Hearing dates: 3 October 2014 Decision date: 15 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Kunc J Decision: Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on the ordinary basis up to 22 May 2014 and thereafter on the indemnity basis Catchwords: COSTS - Indemnity costs - Offers of compromise very early and then later in proceedings - Offers of compromise where limitation defence - Whether offers applicable where final orders made by consent - Conflict of first instance authorities - UCPR Pt 20 r 20.25; Pt 42 r 42.15A Legislation Cited: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence and Tortfeasors' Contribution) Act 1947 (WA) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cai v Guo [2014] NSWSC 380 Chidiac v Maatouk [2010] NSWSC 386 Commissioner of Taxation v Moodie [2014] NSWCA 59; (2014) 308 ALR 571; (2014) 282 FLR 453; (2014) 98 ACSR 274 Drinkwater v Caddyrack Pty Ltd (No 3) (Supreme Court (NSW) 28 November 1997 unreported) Fordyce v Fordham [2006] NSWCA 274; (2006) 67 NSWLR 497 Haller v Ayre [2005] QCA 224 In the matter of Rivercorp Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 576 Ji v Firth t/as Firths the Compensation Lawyers [2013] NSWSC 186 Metro Hotel Sydney Pty Ltd v Kol Tov Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1195 Nau v Kemp & Associates [2010] NSWCA 164; (2010) 77 NSWLR 687 Newcrest Mining Ltd v Thornton [2012] HCA 60; (2012) 248 CLR 555; (2012) 293 ALR 493; (2012) 87 ALJR 198 Ogilvie v Adams [1981] VR 1041 Regency Media Pty Ltd v AAV Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 368 Taheri v Vitek (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 344 Undershaft (No 1) Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCA 41 Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Whitney v Dream Developments Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 188; (2013) 84 NSWLR 311 Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd; [1956] HCA 51; (1956) 99 CLR 560 Category: Costs Parties: Guo Hui Cai (aka Wayne Cai) (Plaintiff) Xiao Yan Guo (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E. Havas (Solicitor) (Plaintiff) T. Saunders (Defendant) Solicitors: Eidan Havas & Associates (Plaintiff) Lin Tang & Co Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/193706 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate