NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Banks v Alphatise Pty Limited [2014] NSWSC 1437 Hearing dates: Friday 17 October 2014 Decision date: 17 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Leave to amend statement of claim granted. Application to strike out refused. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - pleading - allegation of actual knowledge - whether neceesary to plead or particularise facts from which actual knowledge to be inferred - held, not necessary
CORPORATIONS - misrepresentations as to future matters - misleading and deceptive representations - accessorial liability Legislation Cited: (UK) Rules of the Supreme Court 1883, 19 r 22 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011, 12 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (2005) r 13.4, 14.28, 15.4, 15.15 Cases Cited: Addenbrooke Pty Ltd v Duncan (No 2) [2013] FCA 820 Burgess v Beethoven Electrical Equipment Ltd [1942] 2 All ER 658 Davis v Halliday Financial Management Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1371 Giannerelli v R (1983) 154 CLR 212 In Fox v H Wood (Harrow) Ltd [1963] 2 QB 601 Lyons v Kern Konstructions (Townsville) Pty Ltd (1983) 70 FLR 135 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Matthew Banks (plaintiff) Alphatise Pty Ltd (first defendant) Paul Pearson (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: J McLeod (plaintiff) C N Bova w T E O'Brien (second defendant) Solicitors: Adams Wilson Lawyers (plaintiff) King & Wood Mallesons (second defendant) File Number(s): 2014/211332
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate