NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Haouchar v R [2014] NSWCCA 227 Hearing dates: 3 October 2014 Decision date: 23 October 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL: [1] Rothman J: [2] RA Hulme J: [46] Decision: 1.Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING - appeal - onerous conditions of employment not sufficiently considered - express reference - evidence sought to be adduced particularising conditions- no suggestion sentencing judge unaware of conditions - insufficient discount for assistance and plea of guilty - no Ellis factors - no arguable point Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Bland v R [2014] NSWCCA 82 LB v R [2013] NSWCCA 70 Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38 at [67]; (2012) 219 A Crim R 415 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92; (1996) 172 A Crim R 151 FS v R [2009] NSWCCA 301 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haouchar Haouchar (Applicant) Regina (Respondent/Crown) Representation: Counsel: D Stewart (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent/Crown) Solicitors: Shiranica Danieli Lawyers (Applicant) J Pheils, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent/Crown) File Number(s): 2013/61907 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-10-11 00:00:00 Before: Mahony DCJ File Number(s): 2012/222390
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate