NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jones v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1453 Hearing dates: 17 October 2014 Decision date: 24 October 2014 Before: McCallum J Decision: Defendants' contextual imputations struck out Catchwords: DEFAMATION - defences - defence of contextual truth - requirement that a contextual imputation be one carried in addition to the defamatory imputations complained of by the plaintiff - whether satisfied in this case - whether matter capable of carrying contextual imputation -appropriateness of striking out contextual imputations at the interlocutory stage Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Defamation Act 1974, s 16 Defamation Act 2005, s 26 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.28 Cases Cited: Ange v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 645 Ange v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 204 Batistatos v RTA [2006] HCA 27; (2006) 226 CLR 256 Corby v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 227 Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52 Ives v the State of Western Australia [No 8] 2013 WASC 277 Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2013] EWCA CIV 1694; [2004] EMLR 89 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Jones [2005] NSWCA 205 Singleton v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Hunt J, 20 February 1980, unreported) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Dane Charles Jones (plaintiff) TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (1st defendant) Nine Network (Australia) Pty Ltd (2nd defendant) Ninemsn Pty Ltd (3rd defendant) Tim Arvier (4th defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Chrysanthou (plaintiff) M Richardson (defendant) Solicitors: Kalantzis Lawyers (plaintiff) Johnson Winter & Slattery (defendants) File Number(s): 2014/86408 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate