NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dickson; R v Issakidis (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 1460 Hearing dates: 22 October 2014 Date of orders: 22 October 2014 Decision date: 22 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: No case submission in respect of Counts 1 and 6 from both accused dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – no case to answer submission – conspiracy to defraud Commonwealth – s 135.4(5) of the Criminal Code – circumstantial case – approach alleged agreement to lodge tax returns – making false depreciation claims – application rejected. Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act (Cth), s 11.5, s 135.4, s 400.3 Cases Cited: - Ahern v R [1988] HCA 39; 165 CLR 87 - Case Stated by Director of Public Prosecution (No 2 of 1993) (1993) 70 A Crim R 323 - Darby v R [1982] HCA 32; 148 CLR 668 - Doney v Queen [1990] HCA 51; 171 CLR 207 - R v Chai (1992) 27 NSWLR 153 - R v Dickson, R v Issakidis (No 1) [2014] NSWSC 1068 - R v Masters (1992) 26 NSWLR 450 - R v JMR (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 - R v PL [2012] NSWCCA 31 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Crown (Commonwealth Prosecutor) Anthony James Dickson (Accused (12/140639)) Michael John Issakidis (Accused (12/128506)) Representation: Counsel: M. McHugh SC, S. Flood, A.P.C. McGrath (Crown) B. Gross QC, C.G. Catt (Dickson) M.J. Byrne QC (Issakidis)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate