NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fitchett v Bertram [2014] NSWSC 1462 Hearing dates: 22/10/2014 Decision date: 22 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: See at [48], [58]. Catchwords: EQUITY - general principles - equitable charges and liens - whether defendant entitled to constructive trust or equitable charge over plaintiff's property - where defendant assured plaintiff he would not make claim on property - where defendant constructed or substantially constructed residence on property - whether work was done on the basis of an expectation of gaining an interest in the property
EQUITY - equitable remedies - accounts and inquiries - who is entitled to proceeds of sale of property which was jointly owned - whether agreement that equitable title be held solely by defendant - where agreement made after property was purchased in joint names - where defendant paid all mortgage repayments and outgoings in relation to property - whether rent and expenses should be apportioned between the parties as co-owners - whether plaintiff entitled to occupation fee for occupation of the property by the defendant - whether there was actual or constructive ouster of the plaintiff - where domestic relationship has broken down - where ouster not in relation to joint residence
PROCEDURE - costs - departing from the general rule - order for costs on indemnity basis - where offer made under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - whether real element of compromise in offer - where logic of offer follows reasoning of judgment Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Callow v Rupchev (2009) 14 BPR 27,533 Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 McKay v McKay [2008] NSWSC 177 Payne v Rowe (2012) 16 BRP 30,869 Ryan v Dries (2002) 10 BPR 19,497 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lois Margaret Fitchett (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Michael James Bertram (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: J Gatland (Defendant) Solicitors: Kennedy & Cooke (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Clark Rideaux (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) File Number(s): 2013/317904
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate