NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Asplund v R (Cth) [2014] NSWCCA 237 Hearing dates: 17.10.2014 Decision date: 29 October 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Hidden J at [70] Davies J at [71] Decision: Application for extension of time refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - application for extension of time - doing an act with the intention of influencing a witness and possessing child pornography - applicant already serving a sentence for two serious indictable offences when sentenced for these offences - whether failure to consider alternative to custodial sentence - whether principle of totality properly applied - whether applicant's age should have been taken into account as a mitigating factor - no adequate explanation for delay - interests of justice did not require the granting of an extension of time - adequate consideration given to need to impose a custodial sentence - principle of totality properly observed - applicant's age fully taken into account - application for extension of time refused. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - ss 323(a) and 324 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 44(2) Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Barton v R [2009] NSWCCA 164 Goebel-McGregor v R [2006] NSWCCA 390 Kentwell v R [2014] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v R [1988] HCA 70; 166 CLR 159 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; 224 CLR 120 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Asplund [2010] NSWCCA 316 R v Jarrold [2010] NSWCCA 69 R v Young [1999] NSWCCA 275 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; 195 A Crim R 38 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kenneth Asplund - Applicant Regina (Cth) - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr R Sweet - Applicant Mr P McGuire - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Malcolm Carr - Applicant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2008/196684 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-04-13 00:00:00 Before: Hock DCJ File Number(s): 2008/196684
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate