NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: RCR Resolve FM v Serco Australia [2014] NSWSC 1477 Hearing dates: 24/10/2014 Decision date: 24 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Order that proceedings be transferred from the District Court to the Supreme Court and heard together with these proceedings. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application seeking transfer of District Court Proceedings to Supreme Court - where two sets of proceedings in different courts - where two sets of proceedings deal with same factual and legal issue - where separate proceedings would mean that the same issue would be determined by different judges in different courts - whether transfer of proceedings is likely to delay hearing PROCEDURE - application for consolidation of proceedings - where District Court proceedings on same factual issues transferred to Supreme Court - whether any benefit to reconstituting two sets of proceedings and repleading claims - whether sufficient to hear cases together with evidence in one to be evidence in both PROCEDURE - costs - whether costs should follow the event - where respondent took the risk as to costs in opposing the motion - where warning given that costs would be sought if motion was opposed Cases Cited: A Goninan & Co v Atlas Steels [2003] NSWSC 956 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: RCR Resolve FM Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Serco Australia Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: TJ Breakspear (Plaintiff) A d'Arville (Defendant) R C Gration (Respondent) Solicitors: Allen & Overy (Plaintiff) Baker & McKenzie (Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/229168 Decision under appeal File Number(s): 2014/229168
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate