NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: PFC v R (No.2) [2014] NSWCCA 241 Hearing dates: 23/10/2014 Decision date: 30 October 2014 Before: Fullerton J R A Hulme J Garling J Decision: Application pursuant to Rule 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules to vary the orders entered by the Court of Criminal Appeal on 15 December 2011 dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - procedure - reconstitution of the Court; application for - apprehended bias, whether - remarks in case management hearing - lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the question being decided, whether - no apprehended bias CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - procedure - leave to vary orders of Court of Criminal Appeal; application for - Criminal Appeal Rules; Rule 50C -- whether Court proceeded on a misapprehension of fact or law - misapprehensions of law - fraud exception to finality of litigation, whether - access to documents - no misapprehension of law - misapprehension of Court of Criminal Appeal in considering whether the convictions were unsafe or unsatisfactory, whether - misapplication of the principles in SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400, whether - correct application - misapprehensions of fact - multiple documents - not tendered at trial - not put before Court as fresh evidence - no misapprehension of any fact on material before the Court - attempt to reargue unsuccessful appeal - representation at trial - dealt with comprehensively by Court of Criminal Appeal - attempt to reargue unsuccessful appeal Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Achurch v The Queen [2014] HCA 10, (2014) 88 ALJR 490 Akkawi v R (No.2) [2013] NSWCCA 72 Alramadan v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No.2) [2008] NSWCCA 69 Baghdadi v R (No. 2) [2012] NSWCCA 77 Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34; (2008) 238 CLR 218 DJL v The Central Authority [2000] HCA 17; (2000) 201 CLR 226 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Kauwenberghs v R [2009] NSWCCA 201 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427 PFC v R [2011] NSWCCA 275 R v AB (No.2) [2011] NSWCCA 256 Regina v PFC [2011] NSWCCA 117. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; (2011) 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: PFC (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) Ms N Williams (Respondent) Solicitors: Directors of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2008/3811069 Publication restriction: Suppression of Applicant's Name Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9004 Citation: PFC v R [2011] NSWCCA 275 Date of Decision: 2011-12-15 00:00:00 Before: Giles JA Hoeben J Hall J File Number(s): 2008/3811069
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate