NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gaggioli v R [2014] NSWCCA 246 Hearing dates: 15/09/2014 Decision date: 31 October 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Adamson J at [41] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - aggravated robbery in company - whether a justifiable sense of grievance has been engendered by the differential approach of the prosecution to the facts tendered in the sentence proceedings of the co-offender - whether sentencing judge erred in partially accumulating sentences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 97(2) Cases Cited: Baquiran v R [2014] NSWCCA 221 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Ith v R [2013] NSWCCA 280 Ivory v R [2014] NSWCCA 181 Magaming v The Queen [2013] HCA 40; 302 ALR 461 R v Chandler; Chandler v R [2012] NSWCCA 135 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; 195 A Crim R 38 Tan v R [2014] NSWCCA 96 Vaovasa v R [2007] NSWCCA 253; 174 A Crim R 16 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Angelo Robert Gaggioli (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Bellanto QC/P Rowe (Applicant) N Adams SC (Crown) Solicitors: Maclarens Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2012/313581 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-07-19 00:00:00 Before: Lerve DCJ File Number(s): 2012/313581
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate