NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Rice & ors (No 4) [2014] NSWSC 1525 Hearing dates: 31 October 2014 Decision date: 31 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: The tender of the evidence is rejected. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – where Crown sought to tender evidence of three telephone conversations immediately before closing its case – where evidence had been available for a considerable period beforehand – where Crown on notice of the relevant issues - evidence not previously disclosed to the accused – where counsel for accused had completed cross-examination of the Crown's principal witness – whether procedural unfairness is capable of giving rise to unfair prejudice for the purposes of s. 137 of the Evidence Act – probative value outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice arising from a series of circumstances - evidence rejected Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Haoui v R (2008) 188 A Crim R 331; [2008] NSWCCA 209 Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina – Crown Colin Ray Rice – Accused Zlatan Popovic – Accused Tevi Koloamatangi – Accused Radomir Vukovic - Accused Representation: Representation Counsel: Mr P Barrett - Crown Mr C Watson – Accused Rice Mr L Brasch – Accused Popovic Ms C Davenport SC – Accused Koloamatangi Mr Pickin – Accused Vukovic
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate