NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shah v Sanjiv [2014] NSWSC 1535 Hearing dates: 22 October 2014 Decision date: 22 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: White J Decision: 1.Summons dismissed. 2.Plaintiff pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - application for appointment of trustees for sale - Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 66G; EQUITY - trusts and trustees - resulting trusts - presumption of advancement - where defendant wife sole registered proprietor of land purchased by plaintiff and defendant as married couple - where proceedings commenced by summons and did not seek declaration that plaintiff had any beneficial interest in property - where related proceedings currently before Family Court of Australia - application dismissed Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ross v Ross [2010] NSWCA 301 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 Napier v Public Trustee WA (1980) 32 ALR 153 Currie v Hamilton [1984] 1 NSWLR 687 Black Uhlans Inc v New South Wales Crime Commission & Ors [2002] NSWSC 1060 Shepherd v Doolan [2005] NSWSC 42 Neilson v Letch (No. 2) [2006] NSWCA 254 Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777 Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 Green v Green (1989) 17 NSWLR 343 Young v Lalic [2006] NSWSC 18 Song v Shi [2011] NSWSC 1207 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sanjiv Shah (Plaintiff) Rekha Sanjiv (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Spencer, solicitor (Plaintiff) A Murphy (Defendant) Solicitors: Spencer & Co Legal (Plaintiff) Slater & Gordon (Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/290741
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate