NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Grace v Grace (No 10); In the matter of Phoenix Rising Investments Pty Limited (ACN 123 623 754) [2014] NSWSC 1538 Hearing dates: Tuesday, 4 November 2014 Date of orders: 04 November 2014 Decision date: 04 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Notice to Produce addressed to the second defendant dated 16 October 2014 set aside; Subpoena to produce to American Express Australia Limited issued on 28 October 2014 set aside; Subpoena to produce to Diners Club Limited issued 28 October 2014 set aside; The subpoena to produce to Australian New Zealand Banking Group Limited issued on 28 October 2014 be set aside; and Plaintiff to pay the second defendant's costs of the interlocutory process. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – disclosure – documents – application to set aside notice to produce and subpoenae for production – whether disclosure sought necessary – whether disclosure sought premature – necessity and relevance of documents sought Cases Cited: Grace v Grace (No 8) [2014] NSWSC 409 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: David Alexander Grace (plaintiff) Deborah Sharon Grace (first defendant) Julienne Grace (second defendant/applicant) Nevilda Holdings Pty Ltd (third defendant) Nevilda Investments Pty Ltd (fourth defendant) Dutchie Pty Ltd (sixth defendant) Phoenix Rising Investments Pty Ltd (seventh defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D L Williams SC (plaintiff) Mr D Stewart (first, second, seventh defendants/applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate