NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wills v R [2014] NSWCCA 253 Hearing dates: 20 October 2014 Decision date: 10 November 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conspiracy to money launder - money laundering - receiving corrupt benefits - sentence - executive of Woolworths - elaborate scheme involving off-shore companies - benefits received over 18 month period - offender unrepresented at sentence hearing - offender with serious health issues - refusal of second adjournment - offender lodged detailed written submissions with Sentencing Judge - whether procedural unfairness in refusing adjournment - whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (1999) NSW Cases Cited: Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 R v Battiato [1999] NSWCCA 44 R v Egerton (Unrep, Court of Criminal Appeal NSW, 8 August 1997) R v Giam (No 2) [1999] NSWCCA 378 R v Houghton [2000] NSWCCA 62 R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 183 R v Lambrinos (Unrep, Court of Criminal Appeal NSW, 17 July 1998) R v Newey (Unrep, Court of Criminal Appeal, NSW, 23 August 1990 R v O'Neill (Unrep, Court of Criminal Appeal NSW, 24 July 1996) Weir v R [2011] NSWCCA 123 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Michael Wills (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: F Coyne (Applicant) N Adams SC & S Palaniappan (Crown) Solicitors: Hammond Solicitors (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/80902 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-01-18 00:00:00 Before: Haesler DCJ File Number(s): 2009/80902
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate