NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Matouk v Matouk [2014] NSWSC 1552 Hearing dates: 10 October 2014 Decision date: 31 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: See [18]-[19] Catchwords: EQUITY - Property - Application under 6.30, 7.6 and 7.10 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules - Where one party died after the commencement of proceedings - Where no probate or letters of administration has been granted or sought - Where no representative of the estate has been appointed - Where there is no person willing to represent the estate - Where the registered proprietor asserting a trust declared in favour of the deceased is a defendant - Order pursuant to UCPR 7.10 for the proceedings to continue in the absence of a representative of the deceased person's estate Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Abu Arab v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWSC 954 Basis Capital Friends Management Ltd v BT Portfolio Services [2008] NSWSC 555; (2008) 60 ACSR 580 ING Funds v J P Morgan [2009] NSWSC 59; (2009) 69 ACSR 605 Re J Hart, deceased; Smith v Clarke [1963] NSWR 627 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Nadia Matouk (Plaintiff) Samia Matouk (First Defendant) Pierre Matouk (Deceased) (Second Defendant) Steven Stojanovic (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P M Lane (Plaintiff) Solicitors: C A Williams Legal (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2013/249518
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate