Siewert v Aquatic Air Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 384

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Siewert v Aquatic Air Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 384 Hearing dates: 28/10/2014 Decision date: 28 October 2014 Before: Emmett JA; Sackville AJA Decision: Application for leave to appeal refused with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - appeals - application for leave to appeal from interlocutory decision - whether the primary judge erred in the formulation of an interlocutory regime relating to a property owned by the respondent Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Young v Hones (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 338 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dieter Siewert and Lieselotte Siewert (Applicants) Aquatic Air Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B De Buse (Applicants) DK Raphael with NJ Kirby (Respondent) Solicitors: Marsdens Law Group (Applicants) Gibsons Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/249569 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Citation: AT Air Group Pty Ltd v Dieter Siewert (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1129 Date of Decision: 2014-07-31 00:00:00 Before: Brereton J File Number(s): 2012/169096