NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sunrise Pools Australia Pty Ltd v Sudeep Apana [2014] NSWCATCD 170 Hearing dates: 4 September 2014 Decision date: 24 September 2014 Before: Mark J Cohen, Senior Member Decision: 1. The respondent is to pay to the applicant the sum of $35,282.00 immediately Catchwords: Adjournment - cross-examination; rescission of contract - termination of contract - penalties - void by reason of penalty - jurisdiction -just - quick and cheap - implied duty to co-operate Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Cases Cited: AON Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; Workers' Compensation Commission (NSW) v FAI Insurances Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 362 Provincial Homes v Doyle [2004] NSWSC 624; Grygiel v Baine [2005] NSWCA 218 State of Queensland v. JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146; GSA Industries Pty Ltd v NT Gas Ltd (1990) 24 NSWLR 710; State Pollution Control Commission v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (No 2) (1992) 29 NSWLR 487; Woolfe v Alexander Sussman t/as Sussman Construction Consulting Services & Anor [2001] NSWSC 702; Collings Homes v Head & Ors [2002] NSWSC 1219; Isherwood v Butler Pollnow Pty Ltd (1986) 6 NSWLR 363; CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384; Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Yuill (1991) 172 CLR 319; Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297; Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485; CAL No 14 Pty Ltd v Motor Accidents Insurance Board (2009) 239 CLR 390 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; Marshall v Director-General, Department of Transport (2001) 205 CLR 603; Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (2008) 233 CLR 259; Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 266; Metro Windows Pty Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of Fair Trading (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 232; Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251; Butt v M'Donald (1896) 7 QLJ 68; Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596; Peters (WA) Ltd v Petersville Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 126; Park v Brothers (2005) 222 ALR 421; Alati v Kruger (1955) 94 CLR 216; Vadasz v Pioneer Concrete (SA) Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 102; Xu v Jinhong Design & Constructions Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 277; Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406; Exports Credits Guarantee Dept v Universal Oil Products Co ("ECGD") [1983] 1 WLR 399; Interstar Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd v Integral Home Loans Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 310; (2008) 257 ALR 292; Kemble v Farren [1829] EngR 590; (1829) 6 Bing 141 at 148 [130 ER 1234 at 1237]; Reynolds v Bridge (1856) 6 El & Bl 528 at 541 [1856] EngR 555; [119 ER 961 at 966]; AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin ("AMEV-UDC") (1986) 162 CLR 170; Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR at 526; Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332; The Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64; Toteff v Antonas (1952) 87 CLR 647. Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sunrise Pools Australia Pty Ltd (applicant) Representation: None The respondent's solicitor, for the respondent File Number(s): HB 14/27748 Publication restriction: Unrestricted
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate