NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Christopher Kerrie Gates v Crown Constructions Pty Limited [2014] NSWCATCD 172 Hearing dates: 30 June 2014 Decision date: 23 September 2014 Before: GA Kinsey, General Member Decision: 1. The respondent Crown Constructions Pty Ltd is ordered to pay the applicant Christopher Kerrie Gates the amount of $5,060.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Catchwords: Building claim, building defects, home warranty Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: The Owners - Strata Plan No 76674 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Kerrie Gates (applicant) Crown Constructions Pty Ltd (respondent) File Number(s): HB 14/02808 Publication restriction: Unrestricted
reasons for decision Application 1 In an application filed in the Tribunal on 14 January 2014 the applicant sought an order that the respondent pay an amount of $6,600.00. 2 The applicant alleged that the respondent had breached its statutory warranty obligations pursuant to section 18B of the Home Building Act 1989 by failing to rectify water leaks and drummy tiles in the bathroom.
Jurisdiction 3 Section 48K(1) of the Home Building Act 1989 (the "Act") provides that: The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine any building claim brought before it in accordance with this Part in which the amount claimed does not exceed $500,000 (or any other higher or lower figure prescribed by the regulations). 4 A "building claim" is defined in section 48A of the Act as follows: 48A Definitions In this Part: building claim means a claim for: (a)the payment of a specified sum of money, or (b)the supply of specified services, or (c)relief from payment of a specified sum of money, or (d)the delivery, return or replacement of specified goods or goods of a specified description or (e)a combination of two or more of the remedies referred to in paragraphs (a)-(d), that arises from a supply of building goods or services whether under a contract or not, or that arises under a contract that is collateral to a contract for the supply of building goods or services, but does not include a claim that the regulations declare not to be a building claim. "building dispute" means a dispute that has been notified as referred to in section 48C. "building goods or services" means goods or services supplied for or in connection with the carrying out of residential building work or specialist work, being goods or services: (f)supplied by the person who contracts to do, or otherwise does, that work, or (g)supplied in any circumstances prescribed by the regulations to the person who contracts to do that work. 5 Section 48A(2) of the Act Provides that a "building claim" includes: (b) a claim for compensation for loss arising from a breach of statutory warranty implied under Part 2C. 6 The Tribunal finds that the applicant's claim is a building claim as defined and it has jurisdiction to hear and determine the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate