NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Curtis [2014] NSWSC 1582 Hearing dates: 31 October 2014 Decision date: 14 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Davies J Decision: Defendant's application for costs is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - costs - trial vacated at late stage on application of Crown - arising from stay based on Lee v The Queen principles - whether costs order can be made - what must be shown - whether fault on the part of the Crown Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Curtis v R [2014] NSWSC 1392 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Lee v NSW Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39; (2013) 302 ALR 363 Lee v The Queen; Lee v The Queen [2013] NSWCCA 68 Lee v The Queen; Lee v The Queen [2014] HCA 20 Petroulias v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 154; (2007) 176 A Crim R 302 R v Catena (No 3) [2013] WASC 97 R v Fisher [2003] NSWCCA 41; (2003) 56 NSWLR 625 R v Mosely [1992] 28 NSWLR 735 R v Selim [2007] NSWSC 154. Category: Costs Parties: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Oliver Peter Curtis (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Staehli SC (Crown) M Thangaraj SC & R Higgins (Defendant) Solicitors: Solicitor for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Clifford Chance (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/12117
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate