NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hopoi [2014] NSWCCA 263 Hearing dates: 27 October 2014 Decision date: 26 November 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Remit the matter to the District Court for sentence of the Respondent according to law. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - robbery with wounding - deferral of sentence under s 11 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act - crown appeal - where deferral appropriate - sentencing judge places emphasis on rehabilitation - no finding of objective seriousness - custodial sentence ordinarily required - sentence of deferral manifestly inadequate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 XCLR 462 R v Brown [2009] NSWCCA 6; 193 A Crim R 574 R v Farrell [2014] NSWCCA 30 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381; 134 A Crim R 174 R v Thomas [2007] NSWCCA 269 R v Trindall [2002] NSWCCA 364; 133 A Crim R 119 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Applicant) Sione Ahoakotau Hopoi (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Girdham SC (Crown) C Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Proscecutions (Crown) Legal Aid of NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/314809 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2014-07-23 00:00:00 Before: Williams DCJ File Number(s): 2012/314809
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate