NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gallagher v Veterinary Practitioners Board of New South Wales [2014] NSWCATOD 132 Hearing dates: 28 March 2014 Decision date: 13 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: S Higgins, Principal Member Dr T Carter, Senior Member F Clark, General Member Decision: The decision of the respondent is set aside. Catchwords: PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE - registered employed veterinary practitioner - complaint that the applicant allegedly failed to appropriately diagnose and treat the complainants' dog - respondent found the applicant's alleged failure was a breach of clause 4, 5 and 8 of the Veterinary Practitioners Code of Professional Conduct - respondent made a finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct and issued a caution
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW - whether decision of the respondent was the correct and preferred decision - application of the regulations to the meaning of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct - whether breaches of clause 4, 5 and 8 of the Veterinary Practitioners Code of Professional Conduct constitute unsatisfactory professional conduct - unintentional breach of clause 8 of the Veterinary Practitioners Code of Professional Conduct - no finding of professional misconduct or unsatisfactory professional conduct Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Administrative Decisions tribunal Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Veterinary Practice Act 2003 Veterinary Practice Regulation 2006 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dr Julia Gallagher (Applicant) Veterinary Practitioners Board of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 133273
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate