NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hall v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1604 Hearing dates: 11 November 2014 Decision date: 14 November 2014 Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff's application to amend the further amended statement of claim allowed Catchwords: DEFAMATION - pleadings - plaintiff's application to amend - whether plaintiff entitled to adopt defendant's contextual imputations - pleading alternatives as contextual imputations - whether amendment would cause prejudice to defendant - whether refusal to allow amendment would cause injustice to plaintiff Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 Defamation Act 1974 Cases Cited: Besser v Kermode [2011] NSWCA 174; reported as Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Kermode (2011) 81 NSWLR 157 Holt v TCN Channel Nine [2014] NSWCA 90 Kelly v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 166 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 307 Waterhouse v The Age Company Limited [2012] NSWSC 9 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: David Hall (plaintiff) TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (first defendant) Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Chrysanthou (plaintiff) M Richardson (defendants) Solicitors: Kalantzis Lawyers (plaintiff) Johnson Winter Slattery (defendants) File Number(s): 2013/342926 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate