NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: National Australia Bank Limited v Smith [2014] NSWSC 1605 Hearing dates: 25-28 March 2013, 3, 4, 5, 15, 17, 18, 19, 22 April 2013 and 23 October 2013 Decision date: 13 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Slattery J Decision: See paragraph [366]. Catchwords: BANKING - a bank advanced money to a company for the purchase of a business and took mortgage security over the domestic residence of the company's principal and his wife to support their guarantees of the bank's advance to the company - the company defaulted on the loan - the guarantors sold their residence partially to satisfy the Bank's claims on the guarantees - whether the Bank engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct or unconscionable conduct in relation to the guarantees and the mortgage - whether these securities are unjust under the Contracts Review Act 1980 - whether these securities should be declared void, varied or their provisions not enforced. Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ankar Pty Limited v National Westminster Finance (Aust) Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 549 Antonovic v Volcker (1986) 7 NSWLR 151 Beneficial Finance Corporation v Karavas (1991) 23 NSWLR 256 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 CBA v Smith (1991) 42 FCR 390 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Starrs [2012] SASC 222 Con-stan Industries of Australia Pty Limited v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Limited (1986) 160 CLR 226 Daly v The Sydney Stock Exchange Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 371 Dilosa v Latec (Finance) Pty Limited (1966) 84 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 557 Elkotairi v Permanent Trustee Co Limited (2002) 11 BPR 20 Fast Fixed Loans Pty Limited v Samardzic [2012] NSWCA 260 Garcia v National Australia Bank (1998) 194 CLR 395 Holme v Brunskill (1878) 3 QBD 495 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 Nguyen v Taylor (1992) 27 NSW LR 48 Payne v Parker (1976) 1 NSWLR 191 Perpetual Trustee Company v Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41 (2005) 14 BPR 26 Perpetual Trustees Victoria v Longobardi [2009] NSWSC 654 Provident Capital Ltd v Papa [2013] NSWCA 36 Riz v Perpetual Trustee Australia [2007] NSWSC 1153 Sam Management Services (Aust) Pty Ltd v Bank of Western Australia Ltd [2009] NSWSC 676 State Bank of New South Wales v Chia (2000) 50 NSWLR 587 Sun North Investments Pty Ltd v Dale & Anor [2013] QSC 44 Ting v Blanche (1993) 118 ALR 543 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389 West v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 Westpac Banking Corporation v Belgroup Ltd (in liq) (No. 3) [2012] WASCA 157 Yerkey v Jones (1939) 63 CLR 649 Category: Principal judgment Parties: National Australia Bank (P) Craig Trevor Smith (D1) Denise Vitalli-Smith (D2) Patrick George Smith (D3) Nadine Anne Smith (D4) GHS Financial Services (XD) Representation: Counsel: D.C. Price (P) B. McClintock SC/G. Rubagotti (D1&2) M Tibbey (D3 and D4) B. McManus (XD) D.C. Price (P) B. McClintock SC/G. Rubagotti (D1&2) M Tibbey (D3 and D4) B. McManus (XD) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (Plaintiff) Peter Barker (D3 and D4) File Number(s): 2009/296546 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate