NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BFR and BFS v Moree Plains Shire Council [2014] NSWCATAD 197 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 14 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: N Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: Under s.55(2) of the PIPP Act the Tribunal decides to take no action in this matter Catchwords: unsolicited complaint - information collected - complaint investigated - alleged breach of privacy Legislation Cited: Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Cases Cited: WL v Randwick City Council[2007] NSW ADTAP 58 Department of Education and Training v VK [2010] NSWADTAP 52 Vice-Chancellor, Macquarie University v FM (GD) [2003] NSWADTAP 43 OA v New South Wales Department of Housing (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 94 OS v Mudgee Shire Council [2009] NSWADT 315 KD v NSW Medical Board [2004] NSWADT 5 Nakhal Nasar v State of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 101 BN v Hornsby Shire Council [2008] NSWADT 249 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BFR and BFS (Applicant) Moree Plains Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: BFR and BFS (Applicants in person) Web and Boland Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 1410117 Publication restriction: Section 64(1), Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 - Restriction against publication of information that will identify the applicant, any victims, witnesses, or evidence given and received in the Tribunal hearing or in relation to the proceedings which is likely to identify those persons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate