NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Brian Stanley Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd (No 4) [2014] NSWSC 1616 Hearing dates: 15-18 September 2014, 22-24 September 2014, 29 September 2014, 2 October 2014 Decision date: 17 November 2014 Before: Rothman J Decision: 1.Judgment for the plaintiff; 2.The defendants shall pay the plaintiff damages in the sum of $125,000; 3.The defendants shall pay, in addition, interest on the above amount pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, at the rate of 3.75% from 6 June 2011 until the date of judgment; 4.The defendants shall pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the proceedings; 5.Liberty to apply to all parties on any special or different order as to costs or interest within 14 days from the date hereof; 6.The plaintiff shall file and serve a draft Minutes of Order within 21 days of the date hereof. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - Damages - Jury verdict - Two imputations proved true and five further imputations not proved true - Publication defamatory overall - assessment of damage Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Defamation Act 2005 Passenger Transport Regulation 2007 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ahmadi v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 702 Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [2002] NSWCA 419 Associated Newspaper Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371 Atkinson v Fitzwalter [1987] 1 WLR 201 Brian Stanley Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1593 Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1993] HCA 31; (1993) 178 CLR 44 Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed [2010] NSWCA 335; (2010) 278 ALR 232 Clark v Ainsworth (1996) 40 NSWLR 463 Chappel v Mirror Newspaper Ltd (NSWCA, 14 June 1984, unreported) Coyne v Citizen Finance Ltd [1991] HCA 10; (1991) 172 CLR 211 Crampton v Nugawela (1996) 41 NSWLR 176 David Syme & Co Ltd v Mather [1977] VR 516 Haertsch v Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 182 Holt v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 770 Holt v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 90; (2004) 86 NSWLR 96 John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Kelly (1987) 8 NSWLR 131 John v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [1996] 2 All ER 35 Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic [1991] HCA 3; (1991) 171 CLR 657 McGaw v Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1270 Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons [2001] HCA 69; (2001) 208 CLR 388 Pamplin v Express Newspaper Ltd (No 2) [1988] 1 WLR 116 Ratcliffe v Evans [1892] 2 QB 524 Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 52; (2003) 216 CLR 327 Saffron v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 254 Waterhouse v Broadcasting Station 2GB Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 58 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brian Fisher (Plaintiff) Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd (First Defendant) David Richardson (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C. Evatt with R. Rasmussen & M. Fozzard (Plaintiff) M. Richardson (First and Second Defendants) Solicitors: Michael Kreveld Legal (Plaintiff) Addisons Lawyers (First and Second Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/408095 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate