NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Matthew Heuston v Central Coast Leagues Club [2011] NSWDC 271 Hearing dates: 11 - 12 May 2011 Decision date: 13 May 2011 Before: Letherbarrow SC DCJ Decision: Defendant's application rejected Catchwords: Workers injury damages claim - Application to prohibit plaintiff from giving oral evidence not disclosed in pre-filing statement - statutory interpretation - purposive approach - claimant required to give "particulars" of the claim and "particulars" of the evidence sufficient to facilitate resolution prior to the commencement of the proceedings Legislation Cited: Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act, 1998, ss 315, 316, 317, 318 Workers Compensation Act, 1987, s151D Workers Compensation Commission Rules, R 17.3, 17.4 Interpretation Act, 1987, s33 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, 2005, Part 31 Rule 31 Cases Cited: Strasburger Enterprises Pty Ltd trading as Quix Food Stores v Serna [2008] NSWCA 354 Papercoaters Pty Ltd v Jessop [2009] NSWCA 1 Kanwal v Fieldmarshall Security Pty Ltd & Anor (8 October 2010) Texts Cited: Second Reading of the Workers Compensation Legislation Further Amendment Bill (Legislative Assembly, Hansard, 28/11/2001 18961) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Matthew Heuston Defendant: Central Coast Leagues Club Representation: Plaintiff: Toomey Defendant: Graham Plaintiff: Beilby Poulden Costello Defendant: Bartier Perry File Number(s): 2010/99987
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate