NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bristow v Bristow [2014] NSWSC 1636 Hearing dates: Friday, 14 November 2014 Date of orders: 14 November 2014 Decision date: 14 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Leave to file cross-claim refused. Paragraph 2 of the notice of motion filed 2 October 2014 dismissed with costs. Catchwords: EQUITY – trusts and trustees – constitution of trust – capacity to constitute trust
PROCEDURE – miscellaneous procedural matters – cross-claim – cross-claim by defendant against third party – sufficiency of connection to original proceedings – where leave sought to join parties to proceedings for the purpose of precluding them from raising like issues in subsequent proceedings – leave refused Legislation Cited: (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 18, s 19, s 22(2) (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 9.1 Cases Cited: Chatsworth Investments Ltd v Amoco (UK) Ltd [1968] 1 Ch 665 DG Madin Ltd v Gordon [1964] SASR 64 Walker v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia (1985) 3 NSWLR 496 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Margaret Scarvell Bristow by her tutor NSW Trustee & Guardian (plaintiff/first respondent) Sandra Ann Bristow (defendant) Susan Elizabeth Maclarn (second respondent) Catherine Margaret Bristow (third respondent) Representation: Counsel: JJ Loofs (plaintiff/respondent) I Davidson SC w A Norrie (defendant/applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate