NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DS v R [2014] NSWCCA 267 Hearing dates: 10 and 11 April 2014 Decision date: 28 November 2014 Before: Bathurst CJ; Fullerton J; Davies J Decision: 1.Appeal against conviction dismissed. 2.Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 3.The sentence imposed in the District Court on 27 July 2012 on Count 4 on the indictment is quashed. 4.In lieu thereof, a sentence of imprisonment of 14 years and 6 months is imposed, commencing on 11 March 2011 and expiring on 10 September 2025, comprising a non-parole period of 9 years and 6 months and an additional term of 5 years. 5.The appellant will become eligible for release on parole upon the expiration of the non-parole period on 10 September 2020. Catchwords: CRIMINAL - appeal - conviction - whether the elements for offence of supplying prohibited drug were contained in offence of possessing precursor where precursor and prohibited drug the same CRIMINAL - appeal - sentence - whether sentencing judge failed to consider delay between commission of offence and sentencing - failure to raise delay with sentencing judge - no explanation for failure provided on appeal - sentencing appeals are a reviewing of the exercise of a discretionary judgment not rehearing a plea in mitigation CRIMINAL - appeal - sentence - parity - whether discrepancy between sentences of co-offenders is disproportionate to relevant distinctions in roles played and subjective circumstances of co-offenders - whether disparity is gross, marked or glaring - difficulty when comparing sentences imposed with respect to different offences with different maximum penalties - difficulty where co-offender is charged with different offence with lower maximum penalty despite conduct being objectively more serious - need for sentences to reflect the different criminal culpability between co-offenders with more senior roles in the drug enterprise Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1983 (NSW), ss 3, 24A, 25, 33, 33AB and Sch 1 Cases Cited: Crystal Lee England v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 ES v R [2014] NSWCCA 268 Gill v R [2010] NSWCCA 236 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Ibrahim Jidah v R [2014] NSWCCA 269 Lachlan Wilson v R [2014] NSWCCA 266 Pym v R [2014] NSWCCA 182 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Yousef Jidah v R [2014] NSWCCA 270 Zreika v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: DS (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Steirn SC (Appellant) I D Bourke / M England (Crown) Solicitors: Meridian Legal (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2008/209593 Decision under appeal Before: Frearson SC DCJ File Number(s): 2008/209593
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate