NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Klein and Hubble [2014] NSWSC 1638 Hearing dates: 14 November 2014 Decision date: 14 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The items referred to in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of the summons of the plaintiff filed on 13 December 2012 are the subject of an extension order for the purposes of subsection 92(3) of three months, to date from today 14 November 2014 and expire on 13 February 2015. (2) The matter is to be relisted before the Common Law Registrar at 9 AM on Friday, 21 November 2014. (3) Costs of today reserved. Catchwords: PROCEEDS OF CRIME - where restraining order made - extension order sought extending the period before property is irrevocably forfeited- whether applications for extension made without undue delay and diligently followed up on Legislation Cited: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 92, 93 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Jonathon Edward Klein (First Defendant) Toni Lynette Hubble (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Bettridge (Plaintiff) GJ Jones (First Defendant) R Foord (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Murphy's Lawyers Inc (First Defendant) Mark Mulock & Co (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/386831
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate