NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Legault v R [2014] NSWCCA 271 Hearing dates: 28 July 2014 Decision date: 24 November 2014 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Adams J at [6]; R A Hulme J at [29] Decision: (1)Leave to appeal granted. (2)Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - appeal against sentence - whether sentence imposed is manifestly excessive - no question of principle Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) s 307.1(1) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 205 A Crim R 1 Hili v R; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 R v Basri [2009] NSWDC 398 R v Otto [2005] NSWCCA 333; (2005) 157 A Crim R 525 Speer v R [2004] NSWCCA 118 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Junior Legault (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Corish (Applicant) M England (Respondent) Solicitors: Watsons Solicitors (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/335049 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-08-16 00:00:00 Before: Frearson SC DCJ File Number(s): 2012/335049
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate