NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MK v R [2014] NSWCCA 274 Hearing dates: 12.09.2014 Decision date: 26 November 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Fullerton J at [134] Hamill J at [135] Decision: 1. To the extent necessary, leave to appeal is granted. 2. Ground of Appeal 1 is upheld but Grounds of Appeal 2 and 3 are dismissed. 3. The convictions recorded against the applicant on 4 October 2012 are quashed. 4. The matter is remitted to the District Court for retrial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - take without consent and indecent assault - evidence - competence of child to take oath - unsworn evidence by child - fundamental defect in giving of unsworn evidence - appeal allowed - whether verdict unreasonable and not open on the evidence - identification by child witnesses - discrepancies in their descriptions - both child witnesses identify very distinctive feature of assailant - whether open to jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt as to identification of assailant - this ground of appeal dismissed - whether submissions by Crown gave rise to a miscarriage of justice - whether the trial judge gave appropriate directions to jury - no miscarriage of justice - this ground of appeal dismissed - matter remitted to District Court for new trial. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s61M(2) , s86(1)(b) Criminal Appeal Rules - r 4 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - s13 Cases Cited: Dyers v The Queen [2002] HCA 45; 210 CLR 285 FP v R [2012] NSWCCA 182 Knight v Queen (1992) 175 CLR 495 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Pease v R [2009] NSWCCA 136 R v RAG [2006] NSWCCA 343 RJ v R [2010] NSWCCA 263 Sami Kurdi v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 179 SH v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 79; 83 NSWLR 258 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Warren v Coombs (1979) 142 CLR 531 at 551 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MK - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr H Dhanji SC - Applicant Ms T Smith - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Abigail Bannister - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent File Number(s): 2011/43255 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-10-04 00:00:00 Before: Quirk DCJ File Number(s): 2011/43255
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate