NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hart Security Australia Pty Ltd v Boucousis & Ors [2014] NSWSC 1654 Hearing dates: 21 - 24, 28 July, 7 - 10, 13, 14 October 2014 Decision date: 21 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Darke J Decision: Amended Statement of Claim is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: EQUITY - fiduciary relationships - company director - whether in breach of fiduciary duty by attempting to divert opportunity away from company and obtain personal benefits - whether in a position of conflict between personal interests and duties to company
EQUITY - remedies - equitable compensation - whether loss of commercial opportunity caused by breach of fiduciary duty
CORPORATIONS - directors - whether director in breach of duties by attempting to divert opportunity away from corporation and obtain personal benefits - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 181(1), 182(1) and 183(1) Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 181(1), 182(1) and 183(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 29.10 Cases Cited: Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy [1999] NSWCA 408; (1999) 48 NSWLR 1 Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] 3 DLR 465 Chew v The Queen [1992] HCA 18; (1992) 173 CLR 626 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd and others v Say-Dee Pty Limited [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd; Curtis v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd; Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Almad Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 266 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation and Others [1984] HCA 64; (1984) 156 CLR 41 Howard v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2014] HCA 21 Hunt v Watkins [2000] NSWCA 229; (2000) 49 NSWLR 508 In the matter of Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq) [2014] NSWSC 789 Kak Loui Chan v Zacharia [1984] HCA 36; (1984) 154 CLR 178 Maguire and another v Makaronis and another [1997] HCA 23; (1997) 188 CLR 449 O'Halloran v R T Thomas & Family Pty Ltd [1998] NSWSC 596; (1998) 45 NSWLR 262 Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (in liq) [2001] HCA 31; (2001) 207 CLR 165 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hart Security Australia (plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate