NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Monteiro v R [2014] NSWCCA 277 Hearing dates: 10 October 2014 Decision date: 26 November 2014 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Schmidt J at [2] Bellew J at [5] Decision: The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL - Muldrock error - error in finding that the appellant was on bail at the time of the offending - error in assessing evidence of appellant's mental illness - necessity to exercise sentencing discretion afresh
APPEAL - sexual offending - where relationship between appellant and the victim had ended - where offending occurred in premises previously shared by the appellant and the victim - whether this was an aggravating factor
APPEAL - sentence - sexual offending - whether some other sentence was warranted in law and should have been passed - relevance of appellant's mental and physical illness - conditions of custody - seriousness of offending - no other sentence warranted - sentence not manifestly excessive - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Application by Simon Monteiro pursuant to s. 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 710 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 DS v R [2012] NSWCCA 159; (2012) 221 A Crim R 235 EK v R [2010] NSWCCA 199; (2010) 79 NSWLR 740 Essex v R [2013] NSWCCA 11 Ingham v R [2011] NSWCCA 88 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Louizos v R [2014] NSWCCA 242 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Melbom v R [2013] NSWCCA 210 Monteiro v R [2011] NSWCCA 113 Montero v R [2013] NSWCCA 214 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 NM v R [2012] NSWCCA 215 Norman v R [2012] NSWCCA 230 R v BIP [2011] NSWCCA 224 R v Comert [2004] NSWCCA 125 R v Edigarov [2001] NSWCCA 436; (2001) 125 A Crim R 551 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302; (2006) 164 A Crim R 179 R v Kier [2004] NSWCCA 106 R v L (NSWCCA unreported 17 June 1996) R v Tuuta [2014] NSWCCA 40 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; (2012) 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Monteiro - Appellant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Ms R Burgess - Appellant Ms V Lidyard - Respondent Solicitors: S O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Appellant J Pheils, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent File Number(s): 2008/8845012 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate