NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jean Luc Clavel & Anor v John Savage & Ors (No 3) [2010] NSWSC 5 Hearing dates: 16 November 2010 Decision date: 16 November 2010 Before: Rothman J Decision: (1)Paragraphs (i)(i), (i)(ii), (k), (h), (r), (s)(iii), (s)(iv), (s)(v) and (u) of the subpoena struck out; (2)The Commissioner is to file a schedule of documents said to be privileged under s 170 of the Police Act 1990 Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Subpoena - Objection to production - Statutory privilege under s 170 Police Act 1990 - Whether legitimate forensic purpose - Interrelationship of Police Act 1970 and Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 1.9(3) - Definition of "privileged information" and "privileged document" Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Police Act 1990 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Carnell v Mann [1998] FCA 1566; (1998) 89 FCR 247 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49 Grant v Downs [1976] HCA 63; (1976) 135 CLR 674 Kennedy v Wallace [2004] FCAFC 337 Project Blue Sky Inc & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd v Singapore Airlines Ltd & Qantas Airways Ltd [2005] NSWCA 47 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Jean Luc Clavel (First Plaintiff) Sarah Luc Clavel (Second Plaintiff) John Savage (First Defendant) Kim Savage (Second Defendant) The State of New South Wales (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Baran/M Eirth (Plaintiffs) Self represented (First Defendant) Self represented (Second Defendant) P W Neil SC/G Giagios (Third Defendant) Solicitors: File Number(s): 2002/69251 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate