NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Finch v R [2014] NSWCCA 278 Hearing dates: 8 August 2014 Decision date: 24 November 2014 Before: Simpson J at [1]; Adams J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - possession for purpose of supply of large commercial supply of lysergide and indictable quantity of methylamphetamine - unusual case - possession not by choice but retained possession for the purpose of supply - asserted errors in assessment by trial judge of seriousness of offence and aspects of subjective case - asserted excessive differential between sentences - error not established - sentences imposed reflected differing maximum penalties - manifest excess not established Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen John Finch (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms A Francis (Applicant) Mr N J Adams (Crown) Solicitors: Hardinlaw Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2010/291599 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-04-12 00:00:00 Before: Berman SC DCJ File Number(s): 2010/291599
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate